Originally Posted by Sephiroth018
So instead of contacting the authors you post it here without really knowing anything?
|
To be fair, he posted exactly what he knew: running it through diff showed minimal differences.
It looks like it was straightforward, not misleading, and completely true.
The result might cause drama, but there are two common ways of causing drama:
- someone pointing out something that might be wrong, and giving all the relevant details.
- someone implying someone else did something wrong, when it's not even established that anything wrong occurred, especially using misleading details, loaded words, wrong definitions, or comparing to irrelevant situations.
This clearly is in camp #1, and I have no problem with that.
It's the difference from being a whistleblower, and being Glenn Beck.